Advanced Search
Search Results
172 total results found
KABANATA VI : KARAPATAN SA KABUOANG PANGKALINANGAN
Seksyon 29. Pangangalaga sa KatutubongKalinangan, Salindunong/Tradisyon at mgaLinangan/Instiutsyon. Igagalang, kikilalanin atpangangalagaan ng Estado ang karapatan ng mgaKatutubong Pamayanang Kultural/KatutubongPamayanan na mapanatili at mapangalagaan angkanil...
KABANATA VII : PAMBANSANG KOMISYON SA KATUTUBONG PAMAYANAN PKKP/NCIP
Seksyon 38. Pambansang komisyon saKatutubong Pamayanan PKKP/NCIP. Upangmaipatupad ang mga patakarang itinakda ditto, bubuuin ang Pambansang Komisyon saKatutubong Pamayanan, na magigingpangunahing sangay ng pamahalaan na maytungkulin sa paghubog at pagpapatupad...
KABANATA VIII : PAGTUKOY, PAGSUSUKAT AT PAGKILALA SA LUPAING NINUNO
Seksyon 51. Pagtukoy, Pagsusukat at Pagkilala ngmga Lupaing Ninuno. Ang Sariling Pagtukoy atPasusukat (SelfDelineation) ang magiging gabay napanuntutnan sa pagtukoy at pagsusukat ng mga lupaingninuno. Sa gayon, ang mga kinauukulang KatutubongPamayanang Kultur...
KABANATA IX : HURISDIKSYON AT MGA PAMAMARAAN SA PAGPAPATUPAD NG MGA KARAPATAN
Seksyon 65. Pagiging Pangunahin ng mgaKinaugaliang/Katutubong Batas at mga Kaugalian. Ang mga hidwaan sa pagitan ng mga kapwa KatutubongPamayanang Kultural/Katutubong Pamayanan aylulutasin sa pamamagitan ng kinaugaliang/katutubongbatas at kaugalian.Seksyon 66....
KABANATA X : PONDO PARA SA LUPAING NINUNO
Seksyon 71. Pondo para sa Lupaing Ninuno. Sapamamagitan nito ay bubuuin ang isang natatangingpondo, na makikilala bilang Pondo para sa LupaingNinuno, ang panimulang halaga na Isang Daan atTatlumpong Milyong Piso (P130,000,000) ay itatalagaupang mabayaran ang m...
KABANATA XI : MGA KAPARUSAHAN
Seksyon 72. Mga Gawaing May Parusa at iba pangNaaangkop na mga Multa. Sinumang tao nanakagawa ng paglabag sa alinman sa mga itinatadhanang Batas na ito, katulad ng, subalit hindi limitado sa, walang pahintulot at/o labag sa batas napanghihimasok sa alinmang lu...
KABANATA XII : PAGSASANIB NG TANGGAPAN PARA SA TAGAHILAGANG KATUTUBONG PAMAYANAN (ONCC) AT TANGGAPAN PARA SA TAG TIMOG NA KATUTUBONG PAMAYANAN (OSCC)
Seksyon 74. Pagsasanib ng ONCC at OSCC. AngTanggapan para sa TagaHilagang KatutubongPamayanan (ONCC) at Tanggapan para sa TagaTimogna Katutubong Pamayanan (OSCC), na nilikha sa ilalimng Pampangasiwaang Utos bilang 122B at 122C, ayonsa pagkakabanggit, ay pi...
KABANATA XIII : MGA HULING TADHANA
Seksyon 78. Mga Natatanging Tadhana. Ang Lungsodng Baguio ay mananatili sa ilalim ng Batas na lumikhasa kanya. Ang lahat ng mga kalupang ipinahayag bilangbahagi ng ng “townsite reservation” ay mananatilinggayon hanggang hindi binabago ang uri ng angkop nabatas...
449
212 U. S. Syllabus.which may be proved" in § 63a. In re Morales, 105 Fed. Rep.761. No doubt at common law a false statement as to presentfacts gave rise to an action of tort, if the statement was madeat the risk of the speaker, and led to harm. But ordinarilyt...
450
OCTOBER TERM, 1908.Argument for Plaintiff in Error. 212 U. S.The acquisition of the Philippines was not for the purpose of acquiringthe lands occupied by the inhabitants, and under the Organic Act ofJuly 1, 19062, c. 1369, 32 Stat. 691i providing that property...
451
212 U. B. Argument for Plaintiff in Error.The land belonged to Carifio under the Igorot law. He had inherited it from his ancestors in accordance with the na-tive customs and his title had never been questioned. The Spanish law explicitly recognized and scru...
452
Argument for Plaintiff in Error. 212 U. S.Title 12, Laws 5, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19; Justinian Code, Book 7, Title 37, c. 1; Book 7, Title 39, c. 4, c. 9; Royal Decree, Febru-ary 31, 1889; 2 Alcubilla (5th ed.), 692; Third Partida, Title 29, Laws 7, 18, 21....
453
Argument for Defendant in Error.Government Ptg. Office, February 1, 1908; 3 Philippine, 543; 6 Philippine, 606; Strother v. Lucas (1838), 12 Peters, 436;,Philip-pine Code Civ. Pro., § 41; Circular of August 10, publioned in the Glaceia de Manila, 'August 11,...
454
Argument for Defendant in Error. 212 U. S.vision for the protection of rights claimed under ancientpossession, it was in each case necessary that evidence of titleshould be submitted to the proper administrative officials.4 Recopilacion de Leyes de las Indiao,...
455
Opinion of the Court.emnment established a court of land registration and prescribedsuch rules and regulations. Philippine Acts, Nos. 496, 926.These were, however, suspended as to the Province of Benguet in which'the land in controversy is situated, and for t...
456
OCTOBER TERM, 1908.Opinion of the Court. 212 U. S.Paris, April 11, 1899, as far back as the findings go, the plaintiffand his ancestors had held the land as owners. His grandfatherhad lived upon it, and had maintained fences sufficient for theholding of cattle...
457
Opinion of the Court.Another preliminary matter may as well be disposed of here. It is suggested that even if the applicant have title he can-not have-it registered, because the Philippine Commission's Act No. 926, of 1903, excepts the Province of Benguet am...
458
Opinion of the Court. 212 U. S.in the same zone of civilization with themselves. It is true alsothat in legal theory sovereignty is absolute, and that as againstforeign nations, the United States may assert, as Spain asserted, absolute power. But it does not ...
459
Opinion of the Court. United States are to be administered "for the, benefit of the in-habitants thereof." It is reasonable to suppose that the attitude thus assumed by the United States with regard to what wasunquestionably its own is also its attitude i...
460
OCTOBER TERM, 1908.Opinion of the Court. 212 U. S.vations, as this land since has been. But there still remains the question what property and rights the United States as-serted itself to have acquired. Whatever the law upon these points may be, and we meant...